• agent-causation, explanation, and akrasia: a reply to levy’s hard luck

    نویسندگان :
    جزئیات بیشتر مقاله
    • تاریخ ارائه: 1392/07/24
    • تاریخ انتشار در تی پی بین: 1392/07/24
    • تعداد بازدید: 923
    • تعداد پرسش و پاسخ ها: 0
    • شماره تماس دبیرخانه رویداد: -
     i offer a brief review of, and critical response to, neil levy’s fascinating recent book hard luck, where he argues that no one is ever free or morally responsible not because of determinism or indeterminism, but because of luck. two of levy’s central arguments in defending his free will nihilism concern the nature and role of explanation in a theory of moral responsibility and the nature of akrasia. with respect to explanation, levy argues that an adequate theory of moral responsibility must be able provide contrastive explanations of why an agent performs one action rather thananother, and that libertarians lack the resources to provide such explanations. with respect to akrasia, levy argues that it is impossible to be directly morally responsible for akratic actions. in response i argue that any sense of contrastive explanation that can reasonably be thought to be a requirement on an adequate theory of moral responsibility is a sense that agent-causal libertarians can secure. i then argue that the agent-causal theory of free will offers an alternative and attractive understanding of motivation and self-control (than offered by levy) that makes it plausible to think that we can be morally responsible for akratic actions.

سوال خود را در مورد این مقاله مطرح نمایید :

با انتخاب دکمه ثبت پرسش، موافقت خود را با قوانین انتشار محتوا در وبسایت تی پی بین اعلام می کنم
مقالات جدیدترین رویدادها
مقالات جدیدترین ژورنال ها