• wrongfulness and prohibitions

    نویسندگان :
    جزئیات بیشتر مقاله
    • تاریخ ارائه: 1392/07/24
    • تاریخ انتشار در تی پی بین: 1392/07/24
    • تعداد بازدید: 911
    • تعداد پرسش و پاسخ ها: 0
    • شماره تماس دبیرخانه رویداد: -
    this paper responds to antje du-bois pedain’s discussion of the wrongfulness constraint on the criminal law. du-bois pedain argues that the constraint is best interpreted as stating that φing is legitimately criminalised only if φing is wrongful for other-regarding reasons. we take issue with du-bois pedain’s arguments. in our view, it is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition of legitimate criminalisation that φing is wrongful in du-bois pedain’s sense. rather, it is a necessary (albeit insufficient) condition of legitimate criminalisation that φing is what we call bare wrongful—that is, that the reasons in favour of φing are defeated by the reasons against. though du-bois pedain is critical of this view, we argue that her criticisms do not convince.

سوال خود را در مورد این مقاله مطرح نمایید :

با انتخاب دکمه ثبت پرسش، موافقت خود را با قوانین انتشار محتوا در وبسایت تی پی بین اعلام می کنم
مقالات جدیدترین ژورنال ها