• comment on andreas von hirsch: the roles of harm and wrongdoing in criminalisation theory

    نویسندگان :
    جزئیات بیشتر مقاله
    • تاریخ ارائه: 1392/07/24
    • تاریخ انتشار در تی پی بین: 1392/07/24
    • تعداد بازدید: 944
    • تعداد پرسش و پاسخ ها: 0
    • شماره تماس دبیرخانه رویداد: -
     whereas liberals tend to emphasize harm as the decisive criterion for legitimizing criminalisation, moralists take a qualified notion of wrongfulness as sufficient even when no harm is at hand. this comment takes up andreas von hirsch’s “dual element approach” requiring both harm and wrongfulness as necessary conditions for criminalisation and argues that joel feinberg’s account of harming as violation of moral rights is perfectly compatible with it. subsequently, two issues from the liberalism-moralism debate on criminalisation are examined: the difficulty of how to determine wrongfulness beyond the scope of harming, and the so far disregarded question of whether the democratic legislator is free within the framework of constitution to criminalise whatever conduct he wants to prevent irrespective of philosophical constraints.

سوال خود را در مورد این مقاله مطرح نمایید :

با انتخاب دکمه ثبت پرسش، موافقت خود را با قوانین انتشار محتوا در وبسایت تی پی بین اعلام می کنم
مقالات جدیدترین رویدادها
مقالات جدیدترین ژورنال ها