• does communicative retributivism necessarily negate capital punishment?

    نویسندگان :
    جزئیات بیشتر مقاله
    • تاریخ ارائه: 1392/07/24
    • تاریخ انتشار در تی پی بین: 1392/07/24
    • تعداد بازدید: 930
    • تعداد پرسش و پاسخ ها: 0
    • شماره تماس دبیرخانه رویداد: -
     does communicative retributivism necessarily negate capital punishment? my answer is no. i argue that there is a place, though a very limited and unsettled one, for capital punishment within the theoretical vision of communicative retributivism. the death penalty, when reserved for extravagantly evil murderers for the most heinous crimes, is justifiable by communicative retributive ideals. i argue that punishment as censure is a response to the preceding message sent by the offender through his criminal act. the gravity of punishment should be commensurate to the preceding criminal message, so that the offender can face up to the nature and significance of his crime. all murders are not the same. to measure up to the most evil and humanity-degrading murderous message, capital punishment should be the counter-message. next, i argue that capital punishment does not necessarily violate human dignity. the death penalty and torture may both disrupt human dignity, yet in distinct ways. the death penalty terminates life, the vessel that holds together autonomy, while torture directly assaults autonomy. torture is never permissible as a form of punishment. but death penalty, when used only on the extravagant evildoers, is justifiable, as life is thoroughly degraded by his own evil act. further, i argue that mercy is integral to communicative retributivists’ theory of capital punishment.

سوال خود را در مورد این مقاله مطرح نمایید :

با انتخاب دکمه ثبت پرسش، موافقت خود را با قوانین انتشار محتوا در وبسایت تی پی بین اعلام می کنم
مقالات جدیدترین رویدادها