predicting real-world ergonomic measurements by simulation in a virtual environment

virtual reality techniques have been increasingly used for ergonomic applications. however, it is always important to know whether the results obtained in a virtual environment (ve) are representative of a real environment (re) ones. this paper presents our preliminary experimental results on the relationship between ergonomic measurements in ve and re for some typical “drilling” tasks. the same tasks were carried out by thirty male manufacturing factory workers in both ve and re. five evaluation indices – three objective (elbow angle, maximum force capacity reduction, and task completion time) and two subjective (bpd – body part discomfort and rpe – rated perceived exertion) – were used to evaluate the similarities between ve and re for the selected “drilling” tasks. four of these indices (all except elbow angle) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in ve than in re, which indicates that subjects experienced more discomfort and grew fatigued more quickly in ve. however, linear correlations (pearson’s rho: 0.635–0.807) between ve and re were found for two of the five indices (bpd and maximum force capacity reduction). relevance to industry using digital mock-ups and virtual reality simulations, industrial work activities can be evaluated to identify potential ergonomic problems during an early design stage, which reduces design time and costs, increases quality and improves customer satisfaction. a validated linear relationship can provide a reference for work design in virtual reality.